Time for action is now!

vote

No matter who gets elected on Nov. 8th certain basic facts will remain as realities for all to confront. It is the unbridled grip of Digital Technology and its implications for the jobs and economic benefits for any one across the globe. The postmortem will include the rise (or fall) of the Republican candidate enabled by twitter, cable news and internet. Such postmortem will also include the impact of the three paragraph letter from the FBI Director, e-mails, servers and their repeated reference in the Digital Technology enabled print, internet, TV and cable media.

As an example we came across an essay in NYT titled “How the Internet Is Loosening Our Grip on the Truth“.  While we agree with the conclusion, we would like to offer a broader perspective.

Truth is something that a rational mind arrives at as a result of reflection and analysis. It is always something “New” for the informed. Hence the grip on the truth is always limited to those who bring a broader perspective and a sense of purpose in what they read (We call them as the System Thinkers and Transformational).

On the other hand “Information” is something that is merely replicated: You told me, I heard it and I tell some one, …… Information is an outcome of a series of tasks. Truth is an outcome of analysis and synthesis.

Evolution in Digital Technology enabled capabilities – including internet – have been fostering capabilities that increasingly separate these two groups of people: Few thinkers who arrive at the truth Vs. Millions of “believers”.

Effective use of internet requires more thinking and reflection on the part of many more, rather than a lazy acceptance of what is available in it.  While the internet – through ready access to information – tries to make you dumb and lazy. One has to force oneself to be vigilant for us to not lose the grip on truth.

In other words, while Internet is the enabler, it is not the cause. The cause for our loosening the grip on truth is our failure to understand the nature and capabilities of the tool we have on hand.

One can look at Internet as one of the products of a broad class of outcomes enabled by Digital Technology and its applications (DT). We have traced its effect and the resulting Binary Economy in our books. https://stimsinstitute.com/20151207books/

DT (including Internet) creates two sets of parallel capabilities.

  • Unbridled access to quality information leads to value added benefits for a few .  The NYT article is accessible to me. I read it, analyze it and write about it. Hopefully this will lead to another value added new thought for the reader. We call this as the “New Solution” enabled by DT (Internet, blog post and e-mail in this case).
  • Just like the NYT essay, anything published is accessible to millions of readers. Many of them can simply replicate the essay by tweet or e-mail the essay to millions of others. This is what we call as “Replication Solutions”.

These are the two extremes – the binary choices – in our world today. The few who reflect, analyze and add value (we call them as system thinkers and Transformational) and the millions who merely absorb and replicate! There is nothing in the “middle”. This includes middle class jobs.

The same goes for “Globalization: When President Obama spoke about Globalization recently we wrote a blog post in which we highlighted the growing chasm between those who create “New Solutions” Vs. those who merely follow the orders and carry out tasks (like absorbing and passing along the information, without discerning the truth in it).

This inequality is now deeply entrenched thanks to unbridled deployment of DT. This is like life before and after electricity. With a flip of the switch the entire room can be lighted. With a faulty switch one can get electrocuted and die. Same holds good for un-regulated deployment of DT. The well-lit room is analogous to the quick fortunes for the wealthy, while the electrocution and death is the slow economic meltdown of anything “middle”: middle class wages, skills, capabilities, production volumes, middle tier price for consumer goods, etc.

There were rules and inspection procedures set up for the proper use of electricity, while avoiding the dangers in its use. No such rules or regulations exist for proper deployment of DT that can benefit the rich while also taking care of those affected in their economics.

One can apply the same analogy for information and the truth discerned by a few and the false hood spread across the millions.

Now it is your time to reflect, discern the difference between facts and lies, between promises and delivery, between proven records Vs. false pretenses. After such reflection go to the polls and Vote. Your future depends on it. Don’t be among the millions who are merely task oriented and simply sit on the side line with “information” over load.

An obligation for every Technical Professional

Irrespective of your political affiliation you should read the attached link for an excellent panel discussion on Education, Advanced Manufacturing and Funding for Research https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-science-of-clinton-education-advanced-manufacturing-and-more-money-for-research/?ex_cid=2016-forecast

If your candidate understands and supports these issues vote for her / him. If your candidate has no clue on these issues then demand their attention and policy positions. Standing on the side line or casting a protest vote is not a good option.

Your jobs, career and future depend on your activist role in this election (and in every election).

10 Critical issues for Millennials

At STIMS Institute we are focused on System Thinking and Transformational Skills.

System Thinking requires an ability to focus on the larger issue on hand – the whole is larger than mere sum of the parts.

Transformational Skills are a set of capabilities to identify a need develop it into a solution with an emphasis on implementation fo such solutions for larger common good.

With the POTUS election less than 2 months away the millennials are now called upon to exercise their best judgement and cast their votes in large numbers. The Millennials are largely credited for the election of President Obama in 2008 and 2012. They are also faulted for their lack of enthusiasm at the polls in 2010 and 2014 mid term elections.

Do the millennials want to be a force of change? This is the question looming for them in the next ten weeks. This will require them to reflect on the larger picture and in a comprehensive manner. Here are 10 reasons why the Millennials should vote in droves in the coming election:

1. Millennials like free college education as promised by senator Sanders. How realistic was its passage into law? Isn’t  debt free education the better and more realistically achievable option?

2. Millennials need Better Health insurance – this would require preserving Obamacare and work towards a single payer system as a competitive alternative to commercial insurance plans.

3. Millennials need better minimum wages and they should push for this as a mandate in this election.

4. Millennials need good paying jobs which will come from Infrastructure investments and more investments in R&D. They should demand this from all candidates.

5. Millennials care for the future of the planet and hence ecology and are against Global warming – Their vote will affirm or reject efforts towards these goals.

6. Millennials are against wealth accumulation in the hands of  a few. Then they should push for policies that would prevent that.

7. Millennials want equality for all including Women’s rights, LGBT rights, protections against police excesses and racial equality. Their vote will affirm or deny progress in these areas.

8. Millennials want to lead the forces to create change – they are credited for electing the first black man for POTUS. Now if the choose to, they can elect the first woman for POTUS.

9. End to end innovation requires developing solutions which are carried on through the implementation and value generation stage. Are 8 years and 2 elections (08 and 12) enough for this end to end innovation?

10. Dreamers are also millennials. Will the rest of them support to create a sustainable eco-system of value for all millennials or whatever the young generation is called in the future?

Talk scheduled at MIT campus

tang-hall-09-27-16

“What matters to me and Why?” – Dr. K. Subramanian

Date: Sep-27-2016
Time: 6:00pm to 8:00pm
Venue: Tang Hall, 24th floor lounge
Description: What skills do we develop to be relevant in this age when computers can seemingly do everything?
How has the landscape of innovation changed in the 21st century?Attend this interesting talk by Dr. K. Subramanian, an MIT and Tang Hall Alum who has over 30 years of experience in the high technology industry.Dinner will be served.

RSVP required. Click here.

What should you do when the thought leaders are so wrong?

slide1

Following is a quote from the recent Meet The Press show on NBC.  http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nicholas-fondacaro/2016/09/11/meet-press-republican-party-becoming-party-less-educated 

On the show, Brooks warned of “chasms that open up socially” between the well-educated and the poorly-educated, and how you can measure other social aspects with that information. He also shared his worry about what it could mean for an educationally divided country:

And so my question and this is really a serious worry; suppose one party becomes the party of less college and who feel head winds, and that would be the Republican Party, I think. And suppose another party becomes the party of the tail winds because they’ve got college degrees, and that would be the Democratic Party. Suppose our partisan realignment over laps with a class alignment and that to me is extremely problematic for what it says about what’s going to happen.

 His fellow panelist Tom Brokaw concurred with this prediction saying that it goes against all preconceived notions the media had about Republicans.

And also this is a profound shift because the Republicans are representing those who don’t have a college education,” Brokaw explained, “We’ve all grown up with Republicans who are at the high end of the income scale and are the elitists in American life. So this has been turned upside down.

Both David Brooks and Tom Brokaw are well respected national thought leaders. No one can question their wisdom, experience or acumen.  Yet in their above comments one has to believe that they are merely expressing their opinions rather than reasoned factual conclusions (which we expect from these thought leaders).

It is true that a large segment of the population feel the head winds. This is due to the massive standardization and de-skilling of work of any kind and in any sector. This includes manufacturing, accounting, medicine, not to speak of Walmart and McDonald work. This has nothing to do with college degrees. It has everything to do with aptitude, a willingness to put in hard work with our supervision and follow-the-herd mind set. For this skill and work, the salaries are rushing close to the minimum wages. So, even after two jobs in a day, one can not still take care of a family.

In the above scenario college degrees are used today merely as a screening tool as evidence of diligence and ability to follow the rules. If you have these skills you don’t need a college degree.

Large cross section of people who fall in this category are both Democrats and Republicans. Simply because Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton promote ideas on free or affordable college education, those who need such help are not merely Democrats.

Since over 80% of what one needs to know as information (falsely attributed as knowledge) is already available through internet (Google, search engines and social media) the need today is not college education, but a job or solution that needs your services. The smart people are those who can find such opportunities and they can get attached to them. We call them as Transformational Skilled workers. Hillary Clinton has been promoting this kind of skill development through Community Colleges and Vocational Technical Schools.

Those with a blend of academic education (not necessarily a four year college degree), attached to real world needs and opportunities, but with an unending zeal (Transformational) to identify, develop and deliver a stream of new solutions are the few with the tail winds at their back in the new Binary Economy. These few are not Democrats or Republicans. They are both.

Unfortunately the current POTUS election is not a contest for identifying these head winds and tail winds. Instead it is a contest between a demagogue and opportunist (who has already benefited from the tail winds at the expense of many) and a life long Methodist (who believes in social good for as many as she can help).

Also the tail winds favor a few at the expense of the many. This is seen as the rise of the 1% vs. the 99% who suffer the pains of the head winds. Protection for the many against the head winds may need social programs and Government involvement – which would be the Democrat’s preference. Instead people may be left to fend for themselves, while Government steps out of the way – which would be the Republican’s preference. Unfortunately these are not the subjects of debate in the current election cycle, since one candidate (Hillary) has policy proposals, while the other candidate (Donald Trump) has nothing but lot of words with little in terms of policy alternatives.

Tail winds can be taken advantage of by individuals to lift their own boats. This is the preference by Republicans (through their preference for tax cuts for the rich). Benefit of the tail winds can be used by sharing for larger common good (through tax increase for the rich). This is preferred by the Democrats. This may be the only policy difference one can see between the two parties.

Some of those who benefit from the tail winds are clearly noted in the media. The many “Pundits” who offer constant opinions on news, TV and social media are not necessarily the highly educated – with reasoning and logic  as their core values – but instead are those who have a drive and will to appear in as many media outlets as they possibly can and repeat or regurgitate what is already known over and over again. We can only hope that scholars and thought leaders like David Brooks, and Tom Brokaw will not fall into that category of media opportunists who express their opinions as facts.